Washington, D.C. — Last week, Orange County’s District Attorney announced that a California woman has been charged with five felonies after illegally registering her pet dog to vote and casting mail-in ballots in the dog’s name in two elections. The incident exposes California’s shamefully lax voter registration and mail ballot safeguards, and RITE applauds the District Attorney for his diligence in filing these important charges.
California barely does the minimum federal law requires to verify voter registrations. Making matters worse, it also automatically mails ballots to voters whose registrations it has not verified. This reckless combination of ask-no-questions universal mail balloting and careless registration standards resulted in the casting and counting of at least one fraudulent ballot in the 2021 gubernatorial recall election.
The federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) requires individuals registering to vote to provide a Driver’s License number or last four digits of their social security number. Those who do not must present an acceptable form of ID before they vote in a federal election. For those voting by mail and who do not provide ID, the state must treat their ballot as a provisional ballot. California does not require this for those voting in a non-federal election such as the 2021 recall or the upcoming ballot referendum on redistricting. The result is cases like this, where pet dogs register to vote and automatically receive a mail ballot from the state who counts it without further questions.
California’s mail ballot signature verification process is also of no help in cases like this because it uses the signature from the initially fraudulent application to compare against the signature on the fraudulent mail ballot.
The upshot is that California law enabled an alleged fraudster to successfully cast a ballot in her dog’s name. The only reason any of this was discovered was because she also tried to cast a vote in a federal election, in which the ballot was challenged and set aside. California could easily impose the HAVA ID requirement for both state and federal elections, but it has not done so. California could also stop automatically mailing ballots to unverified voters, but it continues with this unjustifiable practice. Until California makes changes like these its elections will continue to be at risk for similar fraud.
“California laws create the perfect conditions that enabled this brazen example of registration and mail ballot fraud,” said RITE President Justin Riemer. “This should be a wakeup call for California legislators to bolster its registration verification and tighten up its universal mail voting policies. If past is prologue, they will do nothing.”
RITE is at the forefront of pursuing litigation and investigations to shore up weaknesses in states’ voter registration and mail voting systems. Our litigation in states like Pennsylvania aims to fix porous processes that fail to verify the eligibility and identity of individuals before they are registered and can vote. RITE also actively litigates to ensure states are verifying the identity of those casting mail ballots.